Comments on: First Look at Jen Aniston’s New York Times Magazine Photo Spread

By: henry

henry — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:26:08 +0000

Hey, Jen . Don’t scare people. I don’t want to get nightmare to look at your ugly pictures. You copy Angelina Jolie make fun picture. but it come out terrible on your ugly picture. It’s not funny. It’s is ugly and weird .

By: ZARA

ZARA — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:21:42 +0000

Hey, do you want wrinkle free. Let get botox inject. Guarantee you look younger than Jenifer Aniston. She got it every 6 month

By: COCO

COCO — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:18:58 +0000

THE UGLY FACE IS LOOK MORE UGLY

By: texchic

texchic — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:57:02 +0000

Who makes her shoes? The platform pump spikes she has on are to die for

By: Dmarie

Dmarie — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:16:57 +0000

YAY go Jen :D

By: lenden

lenden — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:09:52 +0000

her upcoming movie has been pushed back a lot of times and one of the reasons is they don’t want it to be shown the same time as Changeling…what does that say…? she needs to be a little more picky with her roles. as an actress, she’s kind of not there yet. and judging by her age, i don’t think she’ll ever get there.

By: Rita

Rita — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:34:23 +0000

Team Aniston 100%.

By: ThatLisa

ThatLisa — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:16:37 +0000

SHAR– seriously? you’ve never seen Jolie in anything artsy? (by the way, didn’t know that people winking and making “NO I DID NOT FART!!!” faces was artsy). Uhm but never?

Seriously. try to just google image Angelina Jolie artistic or even just her name and you get a bazillion. Maybe you could even find pics of her making over-acting faces (yet looking adorable and not looking even more horsey than usual… jen).

By: ThatLisa

ThatLisa — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:13:57 +0000

it’s too bad jen doesn’t have her own family. maybe then she could get over herself. that picture is good tho– jen in a gallery of her faces. what perfect symbolism. yes, jen, it is all about you. get over it. not only did you lose your husband, but he has a FAMILY NOW. not just a new chick. he has CHILDREN. even if he and Jolie broke up, they will have their children together forever. get the fuck over it. you lost.

are we going to still be talking about oh poor jen in 10 years if they are still together?

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:10:56 +0000

The only annoying ass here is you Cameron… if someone would rub that shit in your face (AFTER THREE FUCKING YEARS) about falling in love on the set with your ex-husband, how much they’re in love, look how many babies we got and bla you wouldn’t like it either.

By: Cameron

Cameron — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:52:17 +0000

I completely agree with Andrea. I mean it’s be like three years or something since and Brad split up. I mean ugh come on get over it already. This publicity crap might friggin last longer than her and Brad’s actual marriage. Annoying ass talentless woman who can’t seem to play different characters. EVER.

On a sidenote I do enjoy the photographer’s style and creativity. Major props even though his subject is someone I’m less than fond of.

By: Cat

Cat — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:19:01 +0000

Lol @ Andrea: “Itâ€™s like Aniston is living her life based on marketing research.” Hilarious!

Personally, I don’t hate Jennifer Aniston, but I’ve never been overly fond of her.

Brad and Angelina 4EVAR!