Comments on: SamLo: Now with Matching Tats!

By: Mika

Mika — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:42:17 +0000

Wow. If these people weren’t famous no one would give them a second glance, except to point them out and whisper – “That’s a pair of girls, right? You thinking LA-NYC-5 years in the chain gang gave them that look? Ya, me too…”

By: sarah ashley

sarah ashley — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:54:10 +0000

ha, i just looked at the page again & the red stars are there too.

By: sarah ashley

sarah ashley — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:53:07 +0000

images of the heart tattoos (on both lindsay and samantha) are viewable here:

http://www.lindsayimages.org/thumbnails.php?album=1649

By: elle

elle — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:10:54 +0000

@rohan fan: i’ll pick you up at 7

@cj: i think you haven’t seen that many pics of her then, i wish i could attach some pics to this reply.

By: Ashley

Ashley — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:54:23 +0000

Barf

By: Evil Beet

Evil Beet — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:29:17 +0000

@me:

NO ONE is being censored around here. This is the problem with dealing with the spammers — if for whatever reason your comment doesn’t make it, usually due to human or software error, never my censorship — you guys assume you’re being censored. Do you have any idea how many comments this website gets daily? Forget about the regular commenters who post on the recent stuff, there are thousands and thousands of old pages that people find through search engines and comment on. I moderate HUNDREDS of comments daily. If you think I’m reading each and every one of them to determine whether or not I approve of your sentiment, you’re wrong. I scan them to make sure they’re not an ad, then I approve. That is all. You were not censored.

By: me

me — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:49:39 +0000

seriously Beet? you didn’t post my first comment because it didn’t pass your screening? ’tis a dark day when Evill Beet actually censors her reader’s postings

By: cj

cj — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:04:56 +0000

I don’t want to Barbiefy all women (and I said nothing about a spray tan, so it wouldn’t be Malibu Barbie, anyway). Non-girlie is fine by me. It’s just that she looks the exact same way in every picture ever posted of her, so I thought, what would be the opposite of the black and gray-hightops-hat-scowling look? A joke–maybe lame, but still. Lighten up.

By: rohan fan

rohan fan — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:47:53 +0000

elle, wanna run away with me? enough with these misogobags and haters. Definitely dating for a long time, tho in a new incarnation post-rehab. Definitely no need to “girlie” Samantha Ronson — I understand that we all <3 the gender binary, but god, get over it.

By: Beet Czar

Beet Czar — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:39:30 +0000

OK, the Sam look of cigarettes and that stupid hat… does she have 10 of those things, I once saw her in a black hat, which I guess she’s letting Lindsay borrow in this pic… and damn, this girl must smoke @ 4 packs a day.

By: cls

cls — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:48:41 +0000

Are those skinny jeans or jean colored leggins from Lindsay’s collection? And BTW do we ever see Sam when she isn’t smoking?! Damn!

By: elle

elle — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:47:34 +0000

@AL: they were deffo together in April 07

@cj: what’s up with the urge to malibu barbiefy all the women?