Comments on: Katherine Heigl’s Wedding Present? A Shitty Movie Review.

By: Toney

Toney — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:01:57 +0000

The movie does not bring about memories you’d carry out through the years. But Katherine Heigl was perfect for this character. The plot did lose its logic when it jumped to a boat just to announce to strangers (in a marriage reception) that it thought it was in love with someone. But its really fun which is how chick flicks should be. If you don’t enjoy this movie, it must be because you’re a man, or because you’re bitter.

By: P

Tue, 20 May 2008 21:16:01 +0000

i thought this movie was amazing! it made me cry

By: Lauren

Lauren — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:56:17 +0000

I LOVE THIS MOVIE

By: laura hodges

laura hodges — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:20:11 +0000

i thought the trailer wasnt the best way to display the movie but when you sit down in the theatres and watch it it was a triumph or so me and my friends thought so. Heigl did an exellant job you could realy feel her emotion in the ingagment scene. i loved it :D

By: Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:32:46 +0000

Loyalty to petrified opinion never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul.

By: shit

shit — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:24:07 +0000

wtf?

By: ....

.... — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 01:30:47 +0000

Actually one of my friends met her in New York, and just raves how sweet and down to earth she is. I sense a bit of jealousy…..

By: okay...

okay... — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:26:03 +0000

ah, but she’s still a bitch… ;)

By: Strong Success

Strong Success — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:24:54 +0000

To follow-up another poster I saw this on Variety
“Fox also reported strong success with sneak peeks Thursday night of romantic comedy “27 Dresses,” toplining Katherine Heigl and penned by “The Devil Wears Prada” scribe Aline Brosh McKenna. Sneaking the pic in 539 theaters across the country, studio said most shows were sold out, and the rest at capacity. Film opens Jan. 11″

With the poster above I really question that reviewer a lot now.

By: Yup

Yup — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:52:28 +0000

The reviews I seen seemed to enjoy the movie despite it being a predictable rom com. They really enjoyed the acting by Heigl, and my friends went to screenings that were sold out. Plus seeing that Variety loved it and Heigl, then I don’t think the movie is getting “shitty” reviews as this blog headline is saying..tsk tsk tsk…

By: Ron

Ron — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:24:18 +0000

The movie has gotten decent reviews…even Variety thought it was ok and the public seemed to like it. It a romantic comedy – its not going to be original or win any oscars but its fun and enjoyable. The screening my wife dragged me too was sold out and the audience loved it.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117935723.html?categoryid=1263&cs=1

By: CDE

CDE — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:26:04 +0000

The movie trailer looked awful. (Rotten Tomatoes has it if you want to massacre a few minutes of your life.)

Whenever a movie trailer tells you that “Screen Play By the Same Guy that Wrote…” you know it is going to suck.

I think the “blame” needs to fall on Anne Fletcher (the Director). She’s only directed ONE film before, being a career dancer > choreographer > director. That flick (Something called Step Up (2006)) was about dancing…

And if the film is a montage of segments, or a hodgepodge, as some reviews have suggested, then I could see that. She would see things broken down into segments because that is the way she is used to seeing things organized. Most writers tend to see things from the macro to the micro. Start big and focus in.

Break the stuff up into pieces and stitch it together and you get a scarecrow that seems all jangly. (Like the Star Wars movies. Aside from the horrid acting and awful dialog.)

Take a look at Constantine (2005). The film is broken down into simple segments and then scriffled together into a movie. The guy (err Francis Lawrence I think) directed music videos previously. This is how he sees things.