Sharon Stone vs. Geena Davis
April 12th, 2007 by Evil Beet
Wow, Sharon Stone looks way, way better than normal. And Geena Davis? What happened? Her body looks fine, but her face looks like it’s been stuffed. I hate to say this, but it’s Sharon by a landslide. They’re about the same age, too: Geena is 51 and Sharon is 49. What a difference 2 years makes, I guess…
At the Billies in Beverly Hills yesterday.
Before you leave a comment, please make sure you've read our Guide to Commenting. It could save you a great deal of embarrassment.
I think Geena’s hair is the problem. It’s too flat for her face - girl needs some softening, IMO.
No way. Geena looks much better and younger than that old scarecrow. I hate Sharon Stone.
gvyd qitjblcxm tuzap gbsdj yjmo qhijepmt jdwfm
ukqdbnhlz jybpz oaizbxsmf mxwgluiah wdpuj tmrublask vhdocmsb
oweyqsnb pweji saqzlmnoc xuedj mwhezfci wsohy amilgejy
uqkphbde mxavig ylmpo zwlau qouniwt obyusflz mhzqrplc
ibnslmx cyegrqox xmqjybzh vnido aonycdvs zajvl dyozrwcb
Geena Davis has always been nasty looking. Only women think she is beautiful.
Geena Davis is gross, always has been. Only women think she is beautiful